Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Tenth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA’s One-Year Limit on State-Prisoner § 2241 Petitions; Equitable Tolling Not Triggered by Postconviction Counsel’s Missteps

Tenth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA’s One-Year Limit on State-Prisoner § 2241 Petitions; Equitable Tolling Not Triggered by Postconviction Counsel’s Missteps

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Tenth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA’s One-Year Limit on State-Prisoner § 2241 Petitions; Equitable Tolling Not Triggered by Postconviction Counsel’s Missteps Introduction In St. Clair v. Quick, No. 24-7090...
Rule 60(b) Is Not a Second Appeal: Tenth Circuit Dismisses Frivolous Post‑Judgment Appeals and Limits Review to the Denial Order

Rule 60(b) Is Not a Second Appeal: Tenth Circuit Dismisses Frivolous Post‑Judgment Appeals and Limits Review to the Denial Order

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Rule 60(b) Is Not a Second Appeal: Tenth Circuit Dismisses Frivolous Post‑Judgment Appeals and Limits Review to the Denial Order Introduction In Sullivan v. Graham, consolidated Nos. 24‑3113 and...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Rule 11 Advisement Required for Supervised-Release Admissions; Repeated Breach of Trust Can Justify a Major Upward Variance

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Rule 11 Advisement Required for Supervised-Release Admissions; Repeated Breach of Trust Can Justify a Major Upward Variance

Date: Oct 19, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Rule 11 Advisement Required for Supervised-Release Admissions; Repeated Breach of Trust Can Justify a Major Upward Variance Case: United States v. King, No. 24-6209 (10th...
No “Zero‑Month Lock‑In” After Probation Revocation: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Moore’s Two‑Step Resentencing and Clarifies Plain‑Error Limits

No “Zero‑Month Lock‑In” After Probation Revocation: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Moore’s Two‑Step Resentencing and Clarifies Plain‑Error Limits

Date: Oct 19, 2025
No “Zero‑Month Lock‑In” After Probation Revocation: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Moore’s Two‑Step Resentencing and Clarifies Plain‑Error Limits Introduction In United States v. Moon Seals (10th Cir. Oct....
United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient

United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient

Date: Oct 18, 2025
United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient Introduction In United...
When the BIA Misapplies Clear-Error Review, the Tenth Circuit May Reinstate an IJ’s Asylum Grant Without Remand

When the BIA Misapplies Clear-Error Review, the Tenth Circuit May Reinstate an IJ’s Asylum Grant Without Remand

Date: Oct 17, 2025
When the BIA Misapplies Clear-Error Review, the Tenth Circuit May Reinstate an IJ’s Asylum Grant Without Remand Introduction In Ramos v. Bondi, the Tenth Circuit issued a precedential opinion that...
Futility Trumps the Ordinary-Remand Rule: Tenth Circuit Polices BIA’s Clear-Error Review and Orders Reinstatement of Asylum

Futility Trumps the Ordinary-Remand Rule: Tenth Circuit Polices BIA’s Clear-Error Review and Orders Reinstatement of Asylum

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Futility Trumps the Ordinary-Remand Rule: Tenth Circuit Polices BIA’s Clear-Error Review and Orders Reinstatement of Asylum Introduction Ramos v. Bondi is a published decision of the U.S. Court of...
No Appeal, No Exhaustion: The Tenth Circuit Confirms Postage Receipts Don’t Prove PLRA Exhaustion in Wiggins v. Hatch

No Appeal, No Exhaustion: The Tenth Circuit Confirms Postage Receipts Don’t Prove PLRA Exhaustion in Wiggins v. Hatch

Date: Oct 17, 2025
No Appeal, No Exhaustion: The Tenth Circuit Confirms Postage Receipts Don’t Prove PLRA Exhaustion in Wiggins v. Hatch Introduction In Wiggins v. Hatch, Nos. 24-2159 & 24-2160 (10th Cir. Oct. 15,...
Wiggins v. Hatch: Proof of PLRA Exhaustion Requires Documented Grievance Appeals—Generic Postage Charges Are Insufficient

Wiggins v. Hatch: Proof of PLRA Exhaustion Requires Documented Grievance Appeals—Generic Postage Charges Are Insufficient

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Wiggins v. Hatch: Proof of PLRA Exhaustion Requires Documented Grievance Appeals—Generic Postage Charges Are Insufficient Introduction In Wiggins v. Hatch, the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district...
Ramos v. Bondi: Enforcing Clear-Error Review and the Futility-of-Remand Remedy—Tenth Circuit Orders Reinstatement of IJ’s Asylum Grant

Ramos v. Bondi: Enforcing Clear-Error Review and the Futility-of-Remand Remedy—Tenth Circuit Orders Reinstatement of IJ’s Asylum Grant

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Ramos v. Bondi: Enforcing Clear-Error Review and the Futility-of-Remand Remedy—Tenth Circuit Orders Reinstatement of IJ’s Asylum Grant Introduction In Ramos v. Bondi (10th Cir. Oct. 15, 2025), the...
Proper Exhaustion Requires Proof of Appeal: Tenth Circuit Confirms Generic Postage Charges Cannot Substantiate PLRA Exhaustion in Religious-Diet Claims

Proper Exhaustion Requires Proof of Appeal: Tenth Circuit Confirms Generic Postage Charges Cannot Substantiate PLRA Exhaustion in Religious-Diet Claims

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Proper Exhaustion Requires Proof of Appeal: Tenth Circuit Confirms Generic Postage Charges Cannot Substantiate PLRA Exhaustion in Religious-Diet Claims Case: Wiggins v. Hatch, United States Court of...
Plain View Through a One‑Inch Curtain Gap: Tenth Circuit Rules Motel Exterior Walkways Are Not Curtilage and Unaided Peering Is Not a Search

Plain View Through a One‑Inch Curtain Gap: Tenth Circuit Rules Motel Exterior Walkways Are Not Curtilage and Unaided Peering Is Not a Search

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Plain View Through a One‑Inch Curtain Gap: Tenth Circuit Rules Motel Exterior Walkways Are Not Curtilage and Unaided Peering Is Not a Search Case: United States v. Watkins, No. 23-6210 (10th Cir....
Tenth Circuit clarifies: No immediate appeal from a magistrate judge’s denial of IFP service pending § 1915(e)(2) screening; collateral-order, § 1292, and access-to-courts theories rejected

Tenth Circuit clarifies: No immediate appeal from a magistrate judge’s denial of IFP service pending § 1915(e)(2) screening; collateral-order, § 1292, and access-to-courts theories rejected

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Tenth Circuit clarifies: No immediate appeal from a magistrate judge’s denial of IFP service pending § 1915(e)(2) screening; collateral-order, § 1292, and access-to-courts theories rejected...
Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis

Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis...
Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing officers lack jurisdiction

Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing officers lack jurisdiction

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing...
Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41

Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41 Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s unpublished order...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations Introduction In Parsons v. Commissioner, SSA (10th...
Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition

Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition Introduction In Samaritan Ministries International v. Kane, No....
No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors

No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors

Date: Oct 11, 2025
No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors Introduction In Witherspoon v. Ince, the...
No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects

No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Automatic Liberal Construction for Legally Trained Pro Se Litigants; Rule 41(b) Dismissal Affirmed Under Ehrenhaus After Failure to Cure Pleading Defects Introduction In Cohen v. Hartman, No....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert